Rio Seco

VII. School Finances

Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2010-2011)

Level

Total Expenditures Per Pupil

Expenditures Per Pupil (Supplemental / Restricted)

Expenditures Per Pupil (Basic / Unrestricted)

Average Teacher Salary

School Site

$6,665.49

$1,762.59

$4,902.90

$61,766.83

District

$5,083.18

$68,970

Percent Difference – School Site and District

-3.55%

-10.44%

State

$5,455

$69,404

Percent Difference – School Site and State

-10.12%

-11%

Note: Cells shaded in black do not require data.

Supplemental/Restricted expenditures come from money whose use is controlled by law or by a donor. Money that is designated for specific purposes by the district or governing board is not considered restricted. Basic/unrestricted expenditures are from money whose use, except for general guidelines, is not controlled by law or by a donor.

Types of Services Funded (Fiscal Year 2011-2012)

Santee School District receives state and federal categorical funding for special programs. The district received categorical, special education, and support programs funds for:

Community Based Tutoring
Economic Impact Aid
English Language Acquisition Program,
Teacher Training & Student Assistance
Gifted & Talented
Instructional Materials
Peer Assistance & Review
School Improvement Program
School Safety
Special Education

Special Education Transportation
Staff Development
Targeted Instruction Improvement Grant
Title I
Title II
Title III – Limited English Proficient
Title IV
Title V – Innovative Education Strategies
Tobacco Use Prevention Education

Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2010-2011)

Category

District Amount

State Average For Districts In Same Category

Beginning Teacher Salary

$39,645

$41,246

Mid-Range Teacher Salary

$62,682

$67,400

Highest Teacher Salary

$87,149

$85,481

Average Principal Salary (Elementary)

$109,993

$107,739

Superintendent Salary

$163,301

$180,572

Percent of Budget for Teacher Salaries

45.00%

42.00%

Percent of Budget for Administrative Salaries

7.00%

5.00%


VIII. Student Performance

Standardized Testing and Reporting Program


The Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program consists of several key components, including:

  • California Standards Tests (CSTs), which include English-language arts (ELA) and mathematics in grades two through eleven; science in grades five, eight, and nine through eleven; and history-social science in grades eight, and nine through eleven.
  • California Modified Assessment (CMA), an alternate assessment that is based on modified achievement standards in ELA for grades three through eleven; mathematics for grades three through seven, Algebra I, and Geometry; and science in grades five and eight, and Life Science in grade ten. The CMA is designed to assess those students whose disabilities preclude them from achieving grade-level proficiency on an assessment of the California content standards with or without accommodations.
  • California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA), includes ELA and mathematics in grades two through eleven, and science for grades five, eight, and ten. The CAPA is given to those students with significant cognitive disabilities whose disabilities prevent them from taking either the CSTs with accommodations or modifications or the CMA with accommodations.

The assessments under the STAR Program show how well students are doing in relation to the state content standards. On each of these assessments, student scores are reported as performance levels.


Standardized Testing and Reporting Results for All Schools – Three-Year Comparison

School

2010

2011

2012

Cajon Park

860

860

854

Carlton Hills

878

882

892

Carlton Oaks

874

862

879

Chet F Harritt

854

853

872

Hill Creek

830

824

858

Pepper Drive

867

867

895

PRIDE Academy

805

823

849

Rio Seco

886

865

895

Sycamore Canyon

874

895

895

Standardized Testing and Reporting Results for All Students – Three-Year Comparison

Subject

Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced (meeting or exceeding the state standards)

School

District

State

2009–10

2010–11

2011–12

2009–10

2010–11

2011–12

2009–10

2010–11

2011–12

English-Language Arts

73%

72%

75%

69%

69%

73%

52%

54%

56%

Mathematics

73%

68%

77%

68%

66%

70%

48%

50%

51%

Science

79%

68%

78%

73%

73%

74%

54%

57%

60%

History-Social Science

72%

53%

64%

53%

51%

53%

44%

48%

49%

Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.


Standardized Testing and Reporting Results by Student Group – Most Recent Year

Group

Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced

English- Language Arts

Mathematics

Science

History- Social Science

All Students in the LEA

73%

70%

74%

53%

All Students at the School

75%

77%

78%

64%

Male

72%

77%

84%

65%

Female

78%

78%

72%

64%

Black or African American

55%

45%

0%

0%

American Indian or Alaska Native

0%

0%

0%

0%

Asian

88%

88%

0%

0%

Filipino

82%

91%

0%

0%

Hispanic or Latino

72%

74%

75%

61%

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander

0%

0%

0%

0%

White

78%

81%

82%

70%

Two or More Races

67%

65%

65%

0%

Socioeconomically Disadvantaged

60%

65%

65%

48%

English Learners

43%

60%

0%

0%

Students with Disabilities

51%

47%

0%

0%

Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.

California Physical Fitness Test Results (School Year 2011-2012)

The California Physical Fitness Test (PFT) is administered to students in grades five, seven, and nine only. This table displays by grade level the percent of students meeting the fitness standards for the most recent testing period.

Grade Level

Percent of Students Meeting Fitness Standards

Four of Six Standards

Five of Six Standards

Six of Six Standards

5

23.90%

15.40%

19.70%

7

25.60%

14.70%

23.30%

Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.


IX. Accountability

Academic Performance Index

The Academic Performance Index (API) is an annual measure of state academic performance and progress of schools in California. API scores range from 200 to 1,000, with a statewide target of 800.

Academic Performance Index Ranks – Three-Year Comparison

This table displays the school’s statewide and similar schools’ API ranks. The statewide API rank ranges from 1 to 10. A statewide rank of 1 means that the school has an API score in the lowest ten percent of all schools in the state, while a statewide rank of 10 means that the school has an API score in the highest ten percent of all schools in the state.

The similar schools API rank reflects how a school compares to 100 statistically matched “similar schools.” A similar schools rank of 1 means that the school’s academic performance is comparable to the lowest performing ten schools of the 100 similar schools, while a similar schools rank of 10 means that the school’s academic performance is better than at least 90 of the 100 similar schools.

API Rank

2010

2011

2012

Statewide

9

9

8

Similar Schools

9

9

7

Academic Performance Index Growth by Student Group – Three-Year Comparison

Group

Actual API Change 2009-2010

Actual API Change 2010-2011

Actual API Change 2011-2012

All Students at the School

9

-21

28

Black or African American

American Indian or Alaska Native

Asian

Filipino

Hispanic or Latino

9

-18

43

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander

White

18

-14

19

Two or More Races

Socioeconomically Disadvantaged

-4

-19

36

English Learners

Students with Disabilities

Note: “N/D” means that no data were available to the CDE or LEA to report. “B” means the school did not have a valid API Base and there is no Growth or target information. “C” means the school had significant demographic changes and there is no Growth or target information.


Academic Performance Index Growth by Student Group – 2012 Growth API Comparison

This table displays, by student group, the number of students included in the API and the 2012 Growth API at the school, LEA, and state level.

Group

2012 Growth API

Number of Students

School

Number of Students

LEA

Number of Students

State

All Students at the School

752

895

4,795

872

4,664,264

788

Black or African American

11

837

71

827

313,201

710

American Indian or Alaska Native

1

27

858

31,606

742

Asian

16

940

69

903

404,670

905

Filipino

10

56

903

124,824

869

Hispanic or Latino

208

870

1,205

851

2,425,230

740

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander

7

30

843

26,563

775

White

425

911

2,828

880

1,221,860

853

Two or More Races

65

871

426

877

88,428

849

Socioeconomically Disadvantaged

233

839

1,841

832

2,779,680

737

English Learners

58

845

512

809

1,530,297

716

Students with Disabilities

95

715

620

716

530,935

607

Adequate Yearly Progress

The federal ESEA requires that all schools and districts meet the following Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) criteria:

  • Participation rate on the state’s standards-based assessments in ELA and mathematics
  • Percent proficient on the state’s standards-based assessments in ELA and mathematics
  • API as an additional indicator

Adequate Yearly Progress Overall and by Criteria (School Year 2011-2012)

AYP Criteria

School

District

Made AYP Overall

No

No

Met Participation Rate - English-Language Arts

Yes

Yes

Met Participation Rate - Mathematics

Yes

Yes

Met Percent Proficient - English-Language Arts

No

No

Met Percent Proficient - Mathematics

Yes

No

Met API Criteria

Yes

Yes

Met Graduation Rate

N/A

N/A

Federal Intervention Program (School Year 2012-2013)

Schools and districts receiving federal Title I funding enter Program Improvement (PI) if they do not make AYP for two consecutive years in the same content area (ELA or mathematics) or on the same indicator (API or graduation rate). After entering PI, schools and districts advance to the next level of intervention with each additional year that they do not make AYP.

Indicator

School

District

Program Improvement Status

Not In PI

In PI

First Year of Program Improvement

Year in Program Improvement

Number of Schools Currently in Program Improvement

2

Percent of Schools Currently in Program Improvement

18.2%

Note: Cells shaded in black do not require data.

X. Instructional Planning and Scheduling

Professional Development

This section provides information on the annual number of school days dedicated to staff development for the most recent three-year period.

All training and curriculum development activities at Rio Seco School revolve around the California State Content Standards and Frameworks. Professional development activities support core content areas: language arts, math, history/social science, science, and technology. Decisions concerning selection of staff development activities are performed by the principal, district administrators, and grade level representatives using tools such as teacher input, district benchmark results, data analysis, and focus groups to determine the areas in which additional teacher training may enhance classroom instruction and increase student achievement levels. Rio Seco School offers support to new and veteran teachers through peer coaching and mentoring. All staff are encouraged to attend professional workshops and conferences. Classified support staff receive job related training from department supervisors and district representatives.

XI. Data and Access

Ed-Data Partnership Web Site

Ed-Data is a partnership of the CDE, EdSource, and the Fiscal Crisis and Management Assistance Team (FCMAT) that provides extensive financial, demographic, and performance information about California’s public kindergarten through grade twelve school districts and schools.

DataQuest

DataQuest is an online data tool located on the CDE DataQuest Web page at http://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/ that contains additional information about this school and comparisons of the school to the district, the county, and the state. Specifically, DataQuest is a dynamic system that provides reports for accountability (e.g., state Academic Performance Index [API], federal Adequate Yearly Progress [AYP]), test data, enrollment, high school graduates, dropouts, course enrollments, staffing, and data regarding English learners.

Internet Access

Internet access is available at public libraries and other locations that are publicly accessible (e.g., the California State Library). Access to the Internet at libraries and public locations is generally provided on a first-come, first-served basis. Other use restrictions may include the hours of operation, the length of time that a workstation may be used (depending on availability), the types of software programs available on a workstation, and the ability to print documents.

Last Modified on January 22, 2013