Level | Total Expenditures Per Pupil | Expenditures Per Pupil (Supplemental / Restricted) | Expenditures Per Pupil (Basic / Unrestricted) | Average Teacher Salary |
School Site | $6,665.49 | $1,762.59 | $4,902.90 | $61,766.83 |
District | $5,083.18 | $68,970 | ||
Percent Difference – School Site and District | -3.55% | -10.44% | ||
State | $5,455 | $69,404 | ||
Percent Difference – School Site and State | -10.12% | -11% |
Note: Cells shaded in black do not require data.
Supplemental/Restricted expenditures come from money whose use is controlled by law or by a donor. Money that is designated for specific purposes by the district or governing board is not considered restricted. Basic/unrestricted expenditures are from money whose use, except for general guidelines, is not controlled by law or by a donor.
Santee School District receives state and federal categorical funding for special programs. The district received categorical, special education, and support programs funds for:
|
Category | District Amount | State Average For Districts In Same Category |
Beginning Teacher Salary | $39,645 | $41,246 |
Mid-Range Teacher Salary | $62,682 | $67,400 |
Highest Teacher Salary | $87,149 | $85,481 |
Average Principal Salary (Elementary) | $109,993 | $107,739 |
Superintendent Salary | $163,301 | $180,572 |
Percent of Budget for Teacher Salaries | 45.00% | 42.00% |
Percent of Budget for Administrative Salaries | 7.00% | 5.00% |
The Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program consists of several key components, including:
The assessments under the STAR Program show how well students are doing in relation to the state content standards. On each of these assessments, student scores are reported as performance levels.
School | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 |
Cajon Park | 860 | 860 | 854 |
Carlton Hills | 878 | 882 | 892 |
Carlton Oaks | 874 | 862 | 879 |
Chet F Harritt | 854 | 853 | 872 |
Hill Creek | 830 | 824 | 858 |
Pepper Drive | 867 | 867 | 895 |
PRIDE Academy | 805 | 823 | 849 |
Rio Seco | 886 | 865 | 895 |
Sycamore Canyon | 874 | 895 | 895 |
Subject | Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced (meeting or exceeding the state standards) | ||||||||
School | District | State | |||||||
2009–10 | 2010–11 | 2011–12 | 2009–10 | 2010–11 | 2011–12 | 2009–10 | 2010–11 | 2011–12 | |
English-Language Arts | 73% | 72% | 75% | 69% | 69% | 73% | 52% | 54% | 56% |
Mathematics | 73% | 68% | 77% | 68% | 66% | 70% | 48% | 50% | 51% |
Science | 79% | 68% | 78% | 73% | 73% | 74% | 54% | 57% | 60% |
History-Social Science | 72% | 53% | 64% | 53% | 51% | 53% | 44% | 48% | 49% |
Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.
Group | Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced | |||
English- Language Arts | Mathematics | Science | History- Social Science | |
All Students in the LEA | 73% | 70% | 74% | 53% |
All Students at the School | 75% | 77% | 78% | 64% |
Male | 72% | 77% | 84% | 65% |
Female | 78% | 78% | 72% | 64% |
Black or African American | 55% | 45% | 0% | 0% |
American Indian or Alaska Native | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Asian | 88% | 88% | 0% | 0% |
Filipino | 82% | 91% | 0% | 0% |
Hispanic or Latino | 72% | 74% | 75% | 61% |
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
White | 78% | 81% | 82% | 70% |
Two or More Races | 67% | 65% | 65% | 0% |
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 60% | 65% | 65% | 48% |
English Learners | 43% | 60% | 0% | 0% |
Students with Disabilities | 51% | 47% | 0% | 0% |
Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.
The California Physical Fitness Test (PFT) is administered to students in grades five, seven, and nine only. This table displays by grade level the percent of students meeting the fitness standards for the most recent testing period.
Grade Level | Percent of Students Meeting Fitness Standards | ||
Four of Six Standards | Five of Six Standards | Six of Six Standards | |
5 | 23.90% | 15.40% | 19.70% |
7 | 25.60% | 14.70% | 23.30% |
Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.
The Academic Performance Index (API) is an annual measure of state academic performance and progress of schools in California. API scores range from 200 to 1,000, with a statewide target of 800.
This table displays the school’s statewide and similar schools’ API ranks. The statewide API rank ranges from 1 to 10. A statewide rank of 1 means that the school has an API score in the lowest ten percent of all schools in the state, while a statewide rank of 10 means that the school has an API score in the highest ten percent of all schools in the state.
The similar schools API rank reflects how a school compares to 100 statistically matched “similar schools.” A similar schools rank of 1 means that the school’s academic performance is comparable to the lowest performing ten schools of the 100 similar schools, while a similar schools rank of 10 means that the school’s academic performance is better than at least 90 of the 100 similar schools.
API Rank | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 |
Statewide | 9 | 9 | 8 |
Similar Schools | 9 | 9 | 7 |
Group | Actual API Change 2009-2010 | Actual API Change 2010-2011 | Actual API Change 2011-2012 |
All Students at the School | 9 | -21 | 28 |
Black or African American | |||
American Indian or Alaska Native | |||
Asian | |||
Filipino | |||
Hispanic or Latino | 9 | -18 | 43 |
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander | |||
White | 18 | -14 | 19 |
Two or More Races | |||
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | -4 | -19 | 36 |
English Learners | |||
Students with Disabilities |
Note: “N/D” means that no data were available to the CDE or LEA to report. “B” means the school did not have a valid API Base and there is no Growth or target information. “C” means the school had significant demographic changes and there is no Growth or target information.
This table displays, by student group, the number of students included in the API and the 2012 Growth API at the school, LEA, and state level.
Group | 2012 Growth API | |||||
Number of Students | School | Number of Students | LEA | Number of Students | State | |
All Students at the School | 752 | 895 | 4,795 | 872 | 4,664,264 | 788 |
Black or African American | 11 | 837 | 71 | 827 | 313,201 | 710 |
American Indian or Alaska Native | 1 | 27 | 858 | 31,606 | 742 | |
Asian | 16 | 940 | 69 | 903 | 404,670 | 905 |
Filipino | 10 | 56 | 903 | 124,824 | 869 | |
Hispanic or Latino | 208 | 870 | 1,205 | 851 | 2,425,230 | 740 |
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander | 7 | 30 | 843 | 26,563 | 775 | |
White | 425 | 911 | 2,828 | 880 | 1,221,860 | 853 |
Two or More Races | 65 | 871 | 426 | 877 | 88,428 | 849 |
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 233 | 839 | 1,841 | 832 | 2,779,680 | 737 |
English Learners | 58 | 845 | 512 | 809 | 1,530,297 | 716 |
Students with Disabilities | 95 | 715 | 620 | 716 | 530,935 | 607 |
The federal ESEA requires that all schools and districts meet the following Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) criteria:
AYP Criteria | School | District |
Made AYP Overall | No | No |
Met Participation Rate - English-Language Arts | Yes | Yes |
Met Participation Rate - Mathematics | Yes | Yes |
Met Percent Proficient - English-Language Arts | No | No |
Met Percent Proficient - Mathematics | Yes | No |
Met API Criteria | Yes | Yes |
Met Graduation Rate | N/A | N/A |
Schools and districts receiving federal Title I funding enter Program Improvement (PI) if they do not make AYP for two consecutive years in the same content area (ELA or mathematics) or on the same indicator (API or graduation rate). After entering PI, schools and districts advance to the next level of intervention with each additional year that they do not make AYP.
Indicator | School | District |
Program Improvement Status | Not In PI | In PI |
First Year of Program Improvement | ||
Year in Program Improvement | ||
Number of Schools Currently in Program Improvement | 2 | |
Percent of Schools Currently in Program Improvement | 18.2% |
Note: Cells shaded in black do not require data.
This section provides information on the annual number of school days dedicated to staff development for the most recent three-year period.
All training and curriculum development activities at Rio Seco School revolve around the California State Content Standards and Frameworks. Professional development activities support core content areas: language arts, math, history/social science, science, and technology. Decisions concerning selection of staff development activities are performed by the principal, district administrators, and grade level representatives using tools such as teacher input, district benchmark results, data analysis, and focus groups to determine the areas in which additional teacher training may enhance classroom instruction and increase student achievement levels. Rio Seco School offers support to new and veteran teachers through peer coaching and mentoring. All staff are encouraged to attend professional workshops and conferences. Classified support staff receive job related training from department supervisors and district representatives. |
Ed-Data is a partnership of the CDE, EdSource, and the Fiscal Crisis and Management Assistance Team (FCMAT) that provides extensive financial, demographic, and performance information about California’s public kindergarten through grade twelve school districts and schools.
DataQuest is an online data tool located on the CDE DataQuest Web page at http://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/ that contains additional information about this school and comparisons of the school to the district, the county, and the state. Specifically, DataQuest is a dynamic system that provides reports for accountability (e.g., state Academic Performance Index [API], federal Adequate Yearly Progress [AYP]), test data, enrollment, high school graduates, dropouts, course enrollments, staffing, and data regarding English learners.
Internet access is available at public libraries and other locations that are publicly accessible (e.g., the California State Library). Access to the Internet at libraries and public locations is generally provided on a first-come, first-served basis. Other use restrictions may include the hours of operation, the length of time that a workstation may be used (depending on availability), the types of software programs available on a workstation, and the ability to print documents.